PHIL 347N Week 2
Case Study Assignment: Argument Analysis
Read the following argument examples in this activity.
Dick and Jane have insured their house and cars with Farmer’s Mutual for 10 years. During this time, they filed only one claim for $500, and the premiums have risen 100%. Two weeks ago, while backing out of the garage, Jane damaged the right fender. They didn’t fix it, and yesterday, while Jane was parked at the supermarket, someone hit the right side of the car, damaging everything but the right fender. When Jane checks the insurance policy, she discovers that while the supermarket accident is covered, the damaged right fender is not.
Jane says, “Let’s claim that all the damage happened at the supermarket. It’s only fair. The insurance company has made thousands of dollars from our premiums alone, not to mention all the other people they insure, so they’ll hardly miss the few thousands that their repairs will cost. Many of their friends have done the same – included items that were not part of actual collision damage. It’s unlikely that they we will be discovered, because the fender could easily have been damaged in the collision.”
In a world where medical resources are in ever-shorter supply, allocation of those resources is becoming an issue. Critical care units (ICU) put heavy demand on hospital resources. Adult medical intensive care units (MICU’s) are often occupied by elderly patients in the final stages of chronic illnesses. Neonatal ICU’s, however, are reserved for premature infants that need critical care in the first few days of life. Surveys of mortality rates in relation to amount of care for both units show that on a cost/benefit basis, outcomes for NICU patients are statistically better than those for MICU patients. Since hospitals should prioritize outcomes, it is clear that resources should be allocated more heavily to the NICU.
Using the examples in the introduction of this activity, address the following:
1. Briefly analyze each argument as follows:
- State the issue and the conclusion.
- For each argument, analyze the argument:
- State if it is deductive or inductive.
- Explain how the argument follows the form of an inductive or deductive argument.
- Reference words, phrases, the structure of the argument, or any other facts or observations you believe support your claim.
2. Diagram the argument.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 1-2 pages total (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double spaced
- 12-point Times New Roman font
- Title page
PHIL 347N Week 3 Assignment | Argument Analysis
- Institution(s): Chamberlain
- Year Published: 2022
- Digital Download: Instant
Tags: PHIL 347N Week 3 Assignment, PHIL347N Week3 Assignment, , PHIL 347N Week 3 Case Study Assignment, PHIL 347N Week 3 Case Study, PHIL347N Week3 Case Study Assignment, PHIL 347N Week 3 Assignment Argument Analysis, PHIL 347N Argument Analysis.